Bloody Fantastic

April 15, 2009
Posted by Jay Livingston

Susan Boyle had scarcely put down the mike and walked offstage before the video was up on the Internet. Within a few days, her performance of I Dreamed a Dream from Les Miz on Britain’s Got Talent was one of the most watched items on YouTube (currently 8 million views, and counting).


Why was everyone surprised? And why was everyone so pleased?

The standard answer to the first question is “attractiveness bias.” Physical attractiveness comes with a halo effect; we tend to see attractive people as smarter and nicer, as better workers, lovers, parents, etc. (see Lisa’s post at Sociological Images). If attractive is good, then unattractive must be bad. So we expect a very plain-looking woman like Ms. Boyle not to have talent.

There’s some truth in that. But we all know counter-examples – the good-looking singer  with a “relaxed-fit” relation to pitch. And even people who don’t follow opera may know the stereotype “Wagnerian” soprano – a woman who looks as though she’d be more at home in the Vikings’ offensive line but who has a wonderful voice. So we shouldn’t have been all that surprised.

Maybe what fooled us was not that Ms. Boyle wasn’t pretty but that she didn’t look like a performer. Her hair, her make-up, her dress, her walk – they all carried the message that this is someone who does not get up and sing in front of audiences. If she really wanted to be a singing star, she’d dress the part. So when she says she wants to be like Elaine Paige (who starred in all those Andrew Lloyd Webber musicals in London), the judges and the audience chuckle condescendingly. As she starts to sing, they are stunned – this is clearly someone who can sing – and by the second line of the song, they are all cheering wildly for her.

But why? It wasn’t just because she has talent.* My guess is that it was because she provided a new story-line for the show, one that might have been especially pleasing to British audiences, who may still retain some sense of class consciousness.

I’ve never seen Britain’s Got Talent, but I assume it’s the same as American Idol. The usual narrative is the Cinderella story – talent and hard work leading to success. We identify with the contestant and think: I, with just a bit of a break, could become one of them – the glamorous celebrities.

But success creates a conflict. It means I have to leave my world, my friends. (Leaving them behind is not a problem for Cinderella; all she has is some nasty step-relatives.) The American solution is to pretend that you can have it both ways. You can become the glamorous celebrity, and you can keep your unglamorous, ordinary friends. In fact, you can bring them along with you as your Entourage.

The Susan Boyle story* is different. It’s more one of class solidarity. She doesn’t become one of “them.” Instead, she remains one of us. She doesn’t leave her class, she represents it. So her triumph is a triumph for the group. Watching her force Simon Cowell and the others to eat their original snark is satisfying in a way that’s different from watching the usual schnook-to-celebrity scenario. And at the end, when her Scotland friends backstage ask her how she feels, and she says, “Bloody fantastic,” she speaks for all of us.


* I Dreamed a Dream is not an easy song. It changes key a couple of times, and its range of an octave and a half is a few notes wider than that of most pop tunes.

**I have no idea what will really happen or what Ms. Boyle will become. Maybe she’ll dye her hair blonde and wear black evening dresses like Elaine Paige. The story I’m talking about is the one that was played out in that seven minutes of television a few days ago.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good analysis. Seems like it would be a good example to bring into a class discussion on social class, or stereotyping or something.

May said...

Do you believe that Mrs Boyle's performance was really stunning?
It seems to me that she sang well but not amazingly well.

Elizabeth said...

Yeah, this is a good analysis. I was surprised by how moved I was by the video.

Faye said...

This is an interesting perspective from England:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/16/britains-got-talent-susan-boyle

So you know and a good lesson in English slang:
munter = very ugly person

Jay Livingston said...

Anomie, Lots of article picked up on the stereotyping angle (inferring vocal ability from physical attractiveness) -- see the Guardian article that Faye links to. But I haven't found any others that mention class.

May, The sound in the video I saw had so much crowd noise, it was hard to tell, but I do think she sang well.

Faye, Thanks for the Guardian article, which ends, "Britain's Got Malice. Sing, Susan, sing - to an ugly crowd that doesn't deserve you." The Guardian is much harder on Brits than I was. And thanks for the translation of "munter."

Sadako said...

Agreed--I also read an article that pointed out that what if she hadn't been so good. That is, is it okay to laugh at someone's ugly before we even know if they're talented or not? It's like she *had* to be that good to make up for not being pretty.

Elizabeth said...

Good point, Sadako.